Network-attached storage keeps an eye on your stuff

Look Sharp

Article from Issue 143/2012
Author(s):

Take advantage of the low watt per operation compute power offered by modern NAS to monitor your cameras.

Modern off-the-shelf NAS hardware often has a CPU buried in it that offers great computing performance per watt. Many of these units require less than 10 watts to operate with a gigabit network link-up and the CPU at 100 percent use. A low-power-consumption NAS might consume 10 to 20 percent of the electricity that desktop hardware would need to run. The primary question then becomes: Is the CPU in the NAS “fast enough” to monitor one or more cameras and detect motion when it occurs?

In this article, I examine whether the QNAP TS-219P II, with a 2GHz Marvell ARM CPU and 512MB of RAM, is up to the challenge of real-time motion detection (Figure 1). Note that much of the article should also be directly applicable to its cheaper single-bay cousin, the QNAP TS-119P II, which sports the same CPU/ RAM.

Buy this article as PDF

Express-Checkout as PDF
Price $2.95
(incl. VAT)

Buy Linux Magazine

SINGLE ISSUES
 
SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
TABLET & SMARTPHONE APPS
Get it on Google Play

US / Canada

Get it on Google Play

UK / Australia

Related content

  • Security Lessons: Secure Video

    Unless your surveillance cameras are wired directly to a video board, they are notoriously insecure. We show you how to keep your cameras from being compromised.

  • Chromebook Camera Server

    You can use an old Chromebook to anchor your security camera configuration – the first step is to set it up with Linux.

  • Shinobi

    Learn how to quickly get up and running with Shinobi NVR and your IP cameras.

  • Motion Detection

    The motion detector software, Motion, monitors the video signal from one or multiple cameras and is able to detect whether a significant part of the picture has changed, record and track movement, or launch arbitrary external commands to trigger other actions.

  • Charly's Column

    Commercial surveillance systems are expensive and typically involve maintenance agreements. I thought there must be a low-budget alternative.

comments powered by Disqus