New and Old


Article from Issue 180/2015

Law enforcement officers in Japan recently indicted former Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès. The leader of the now-defunct Bitcoin repository has been in custody since June as investigators consider what might have happened to more than $183 million in lost Bitcoin funds.


Dear Linux Pro Reader,

Law enforcement officers in Japan recently indicted former Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès. The leader of the now-defunct Bitcoin repository has been in custody since June as investigators consider what might have happened to more than $183 million in lost Bitcoin funds.

Given the scope of the loss, the current charges Karpelès faces seem small time: He allegedly embezzled $2.6 million for some software development rights and a fancy new bed. Of course, the actual charges are often the tip of the iceberg in such cases. To be fair, though, the Karpelès legal team denies any wrongdoing and says the money he spent belongs to his company, not his clients.

Whether you regard Karpelès as a player or a scapegoat, it is clear that some funny things were happening at Mt. Gox. The company, which was handling millions of dollars per year in transactions, didn't even have a software version control system, and according to a story in Wired [1], at the time the systems went offline, they had only recently launched a test environment for systematically testing software changes before going live with them.

Perhaps more alarming, some clandestine bots were running continuously on the internal network, conducting fake or carefully timed transactions. These bots, which have since been given code names like "Willy Bot" [2], appear to have been used to pumped up the Bitcoin price, and investigators are also considering whether the secret processes might have somehow extracted wealth by gaming the system.

The mounting scandal around Mt. Gox has not brought down the Bitcoin system as a whole, and Bitcoin advocates believe the event is simply a rut in the road as the crypto-currency ascends to its inevitable role as the coinage of the new millennium. On the opposite extreme, some economists believe the whole Bitcoin experience is little more than a Ponzi scheme [3]. Regardless of where you might fall in the Bitcoin spectrum of enthusiasm, it seems quite clear that Mt. Gox was not ready to challenge the world's financial system, and a 28-year-old hacker named Mark Karpelès was paddling in water that was way, way over his head.

All this comes down to an issue I have discussed in this column before: the illusion of technical innovation through the simple avoidance of regulatory oversight. Bitcoin "eliminates the middleman," reducing overhead and, therefore, minimizing transaction fees when compared with conventional banking. But, until now, this lean and regulation-free environment has meant you don't really know who is watching the money. In the wake of the Mt. Gox collapse and other Bitcoin scandals, governments are starting to step in to enact rules and frameworks for regulating Bitcoin transactions. New York enacted its BitLicense regulatory framework earlier this year, and California has also passed a bill mandating Bitcoin regulation. The UK and several European countries are considering similar measures.

Although these new regulations are largely welcomed by Bitcoin users, they are not always popular with Bitcoin vendors. One notable Bitcoin startup announced they were leaving New York as soon as the new regulations were announced [4].

When the wheel emerges from the rut and the whole Bitcoin wagon starts down the road again, it is likely the crypto-currency will be safer, more secure, and less prone to embezzlement and manipulation, but also less free-wheeling, less anonymous, and less profitable for companies looking to reduce office overhead and minimize transaction fees. In other words, Bitcoin will start looking more like the conventional banking system.

When that day happens, the old and new currencies will compete as equals. Will Bitcoin survive that transition and become the bank of tomorrow? It all depends on who you ask. But one thing is certain: Millions of credit card numbers are compromised every year, and the conventional banking system is subject to many of the same kinds of shenanigans that brought down Mt. Gox. So either way, we gotta be working on our money.

Joe Casad, Editor in Chief


  1. "The Inside Story of Mt. Gox, Bitcoins $460 Million Disaster":
  2. "A Bot Named Willy: Did Mt. Gox's Automatic Trading Pump Bitcoin's Price?":
  3. Wikipedia on the Bitcoin Ponzy Dispute:
  4. "Bitcoin Company Ditches New York, Blaming New Regulations":

Buy this article as PDF

Express-Checkout as PDF
Price $2.95
(incl. VAT)

Buy Linux Magazine

Get it on Google Play

US / Canada

Get it on Google Play

UK / Australia

Related content

  • The Impact of Crypto Mining

    With climate change wreaking havoc across the planet, we were just beginning to think about how we could use our technology to conserve fuel and reduce our carbon footprint. Then along came crypto mining.

  • Welcome

    Is blockchain finally getting interesting? I guess it always has attracted some attention – if not as an investment at least as a generator of headlines.

  • Welcome

    It is easy to write columns on the scary and annoying stuff, which seems to happen every day, but it is perhaps more important to point out the positive things when they happen, and the Ethereum Merge looks like a very positive thing.

  • Welcome

    Newsweek’s story uncovering the man they claim is the creator of BitCoin caused plenty of buzz. As this issue goes to press, the guy they fingered has announced he is filing a lawsuit, claiming that the assertions are false. But according to the story, his brother said “He’ll never admit to starting BitCoin.” So who should we believe?

    Many commentators have argued that the story is not sufficiently corroborated and shouldn’t have been printed, which might be true. But the question of the story’s treatment of facts masks another question that is receiving much less attention: Even if the allegations are true, is this really a news story?

  • Welcome

    Sometimes when I'm watching the Internet news unfolding, I feel like I'm in one of those weird dreams where everything looks the same, but all reason is inverted in some way that only the people in the dream understand. The Internet brings down barriers, including those comforting barriers that provide a cozy space for our moral certainty to flourish. We lapse into approaching problems from the circle of our own experience, sometimes not noticing that we have traveled into very different places. And we mistake our viewpoint for our values, aligning ourselves with others who share a common attitude or rhetorical framework.

comments powered by Disqus