British Local Authorities Hesitant on Open Source

Aug 11, 2009

A new survey by the Public Sector Forums in the U.K. on public financing of IT costs was based on a sample of 168 local authorities.

According to the Public Sector Forums survey report, "Open source software is already used widely by local authorities at many levels and for a very large number of different applications - primarily on open source web servers, databases and web publishing tools." The desktop sector has not been so lucky, with users not being as aware as they could about open source implementation on the backend.

Licensing costs, however, still prove to be a concern among local authorities. License savings showed to be the primary reason for applying open source software, vendor independence being in second place. 64% of the respondents felt that their organizations needed to increase their open source usage, although a scant 44% would see an actual increase over the next three years. 37% would see no change at all. The most significant growth potential for the open source alternative showed to be in the office software sector.

The survey of 168 respondents was conducted between mid-November and mid-December, culled among District Councils (31%), Unitary authorities (27%), County Councils (17%), Mets (14%) and London Boroughs (7%).

The 15-page report, "Open or Closed? A Survey of Open Source Software in Local Government," is available from the UKGovOSS.org website, an online network sponsored by Bull and One Point Consulting since April 2009. The project is an initiative of the Public Sector Forums originally dedicated in the U.K. to being a public information source on digital television and its use as an e-Gov channel, but having expanding its reach to Internet and open source activist issues.

Related content

Comments

  • Click on the images now and they will enlarge

    there you go ..
  • Public Organisation in The UK and Open Source

    The health system in the UK is a typical example. The government is happy to spend 15 billion pounds on a system that has yet to produce any effective replacement of existing 40 year old system, running on a telnet curses based server, when free alternatives already exist. They will spend hundreds of thousands implementing an electronic discharge letter writing system (eDN), that someone could cook up in a week (collects names and addresses from a database, collect form a list of possible diagnosis, and fill in fields (free form text.) to produce a letter that can be printed out on paper (the letter is sent by e-mail....so is electronic, but the GP prints it out because the letter won't integrate with the various systems they use). IT managers will not even consider any open source solution. Now health authorities are dealing with a number of proprietary bits of software, who will will continue earning money by the need to provide interoperability between these changing closed tools...
  • Nice graphc

    Having graphics to support the conclusion is handy, howevert when there is no way to expand that graphic to legibility it can instead be fairly annoying,
comments powered by Disqus

Issue 163/2014

Buy this issue as a PDF

Digital Issue: Price $9.99
(incl. VAT)

News